*apply()*function seems like a secret doorway into programming bliss. It seems so powerful, and yet, beyond reach. For those just starting out, examples of how to use

*apply()*can really help with the intuition of how to harness its power. Here are some great ways to use

*apply()*that can really help make R programming enjoyable and useful.

First, the general structure of

*apply()*is like so:

apply(x, MARGIN, FUN)

- The first argument, "x", is whatever dataset or columns of a dataset you want to do something to.
- The second argument, "MARGIN", is how you want to apply function. The choices are either over the rows (MARGIN=1) or the columns (MARGIN=2).
- The third argument (FUN) is the function you apply.

So for an easy example, if you want to just sum the entries of all the columns in your dataset called "mydata", you can do it this way:

apply(mydata, 2, sum)

But this is not always very useful. We have other columns in our datasets, and we probably don't want to just sum all the time. What else can we do? Here are two nice ways to use

*apply()*:

1. Counting how many columns meet a certain condition

I have 13 child outcomes in a dataset named "births" and I want to count up how many live births there were. My "births" data looks like this:

How can I add up the live births, especially with those pesky NA's in there? Here's a one line way to do it:

births$childcount<-apply(births[,1:5], MARGIN=1, function(x) {sum(x=="live birth", na.rm=TRUE)})

This code is saying, for the first 5 columns of my dataset births, for each row (MARGIN=1), apply the following function. The function takes x as the input (x is just the births[,1:5] dataset), and sums up for each column of this dataset the number of times it sees "live birth". The na.rm option removes any NA's from consideration. If you had other conditions, you could say function(x) {sum(x>2010, na.rm=TRUE)}) for example, if you wanted to count up how many years were after 2010.

2. Changing coded missing values to NA for multiple columns at a time

Often datasets code their missing values as 99 or -99 instead of just leaving them blank. We might want to change these to actual missing so we can work with the data better. For one variable at at time, I can do it with with

*ifelse()*statement:

originaldata$variable1<-ifelse(originaldata$variable1==99 | originaldata$variable1==-99, NA, originalvariable1)

This is equivalent to the

*cond()*command in stata, where the first argument evaluates the condition, the second argument is what is done if the condition is true, and the third argument is what is done if the condition is false.

But what if I have 3 or 30 columns that I want to do this to? I don't have to write

*ifelse()*statements for them all individually. Instead, I use apply.

Here we have a dataset called "originaldata" and we have 4 variables that we want to change from the original missing values to NA values. These variables are in column numbers 2, 4, 5, and 6, as below:

I take the columns of original dataset, and for each of those columns, I use an ifelse statement to check the value of the entry: if it's 99 or -99 I change it to NA, and if it's not then I leave it the way it is. This creates a new dataset called "new data" with just those columns that I choose.

newdata<-apply(originaldata[,c(2,4:6)], MARGIN=2, function(x) {ifelse(x==99 | x==-99, NA,x)})

We print out newdata:

Now if we want the original dataset together with the changed variables, we can just cbind (column bind) them together like so:

alldata<-cbind(originaldata[, c(-2,-4:-6)], newdata)

If you want to be extra fancy, you can just combine the

*cbind()*statement with the

*apply()*in one statement, like this:

newdata<-cbind(originaldata[,c(-2,-4,-6)], apply(originaldata[,c(2,4:6)], MARGIN=2, function(x) {ifelse(x==99 | x==-99, NA,x)}))

how to do if I want to replace the value of x from ID column. Is it should be

ReplyDeletenewdata<-apply(originaldata[,c(2,4:6)], MARGIN=2, function(x) {ifelse(x==99 | x==-99, ID,x)}

Sure, that would replace any 99 or -99 with the value in the ID column, and leave the other entries alone.

DeleteI have this code I'm working with and it has so many for loops. I read your blog and wanted some help with my code. Here is a part of my code which is most confusing to deal with.

ReplyDeletecalcobj_i <- function (X, iter, pa)

{

ww=rep(0,pa$n)

for (k in 1:pa$K) {

w=iter$cw[k]*dmnorm(X,iter$center[k,],iter$Lambda[,,k]%*%t(iter$Lambda[,,k])+iter$Psi[,,k])

w=w*(w>=0)

ww=w+ww

}}

Here iter and pa are lists containing vectors and matrices like lambda, cw, center, and Psi with dimensions specified above and X is a matrix. dmnorm (mahalanobis also gives values) is the multivariate normal density function which gives a vector of values. Do not worry about them.

I need to know how to use apply on these type of functions. Help is much appreciated. Thanks. :)